|
|
Probably, it must be said that the tragedy of Kaiuso started from the place which serves as individual possessions Kaiuso which Nanzen-ji parted with from financial difficulty from the first, and here. When considering now, it was paid, thinking that it will probably be required as administrative and maintenance expenses of cultural assets, properly speaking [ the height of 1000 yen of an admission fee ], but in this Kaiuso, it was addicted to means of raising money, without turning to the administrative and maintenance expenses of a garden wonderful possibly. If you think whether it entered and went to one company president's bosom, I will feel that it cannot be businesslike somehow. Do you take pains in this present situation, and by what kind of thought are old people who have built and done control of maintenance of the garden watching? |